On 03/18/2013 07:53 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
The JIT could be improved to avoid switching between consecutive
operations, but does the cost of this approach look reasonable as a
start?

IMO, yes. The only other good options for higher precision are Racket's rationals and `math/bigfloat', which are both much slower. Compared to those, a 2x penalty for addition and subtraction is nothing.

Neil ⊥

_________________________
 Racket Developers list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Reply via email to