On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > For this kind of thing, my preference would be to change match than to issue > a warning. I don't like warnings that are basically admitting weaknesses in > the language design.... Of course, changing a core thing like that may be > more trouble than it is worth, due to backwards compatibility concerns, > which is why I think it is worth raising here to see what others think.
I'm happy to make this change to `match`, except that I've heard Matthew say that he would have used a keyword for `else` in `cond` if he had it to do over again, and I wouldn't want to change one way, and then change back. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
