Isn't it true that Eiffel does compiler transforms given that a user has "proven" their operators associative/commutative, etc? -Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurent" <laurent.ors...@gmail.com> To: "Matthias Felleisen" <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> Cc: dev@racket-lang.org Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 1:28:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Racket2 suggestion: Attaching properties to operators
...or keywords that would simplify my search. Don't take too much time digging old references that will not be much more than informative to me. On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Laurent < laurent.ors...@gmail.com > wrote: Would you happen to have a reference on that? On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Matthias Felleisen < matth...@ccs.neu.edu > wrote: On May 5, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Laurent wrote: Do you know why C++ has stopped pursuing this idea by any chance? No, and they may have more work going on besides standard work. It's worth reading up on it if you're interested. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
