Thanks. Robby
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > What about a `make` target (maybe named `rebuild`) that remembers the > previous PKGS setting? That seems a little less stateful, and would be > perfect for the reasons that led me to ask for sticky mode. > > Sam > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > I'm happy to enable sticky mode only when the `make' line is something > > like > > > > make PKGS="..." STICKY_MODE=on > > > > Any objections? > > > > At Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:43:46 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > >> I just got horribly confused because somehow I messed up passing a > manual > >> command-line to link-all.rkt and then nothing was working right. (It > took > >> me embarrassingly long to remember this sticky thing and then get > unsticky.) > >> > >> So, can we change things so that "make" in the top-level doesn't use > >> stickyness? Maybe add a new target "make stuck" or something that people > >> who like this can use and so we avoid unexpected state? > >> > >> Robby > >> _________________________ > >> Racket Developers list: > >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev