On Jul 7, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> It would be nice to have some way of doing it with contracts, but > that's obviously impractical -- so I think that a good way to solve it > and other such problems is to add a parameter for the name used in > read errors, and making `raise-read-error' behave in a similar way to > `raise-syntax-error' with the parameter used as the `foo:' part of the > error message. Boy I like this. I can't remember how often I have code up something like '#:function' and thought this is a general problem worthy of a solution. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
