On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > > Here's what I propose to do now: > > - rename set? to generic-set?; this predicate recognizes the new > all-inclusive generic set type > - rename set-immutable? to set?; this predicate recognizes the pre-existing > immutable hash set type > - leave set-mutable? and set-weak? alone; they recognize the other two hash > set types (on the mutability axis) > - allow multiple-set operations to combine equal-based hash sets and lists, > since both use equal? for equality
Sounds like the right direction to me. -- Matthias
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
