I got the attachments, FWIW. Probably best, however, if someone were to submit a pull request with the code still in TR and with the appropriate removal of the current implementation. Otherwise, I think it has served its purpose as a learning experiment and that's seems excellent.
Robby On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle < stephen.degabrie...@acm.org> wrote: > Ugh - the list scrubbed my attachments. I'm guessing my options are to > submit pull request or make a planet package. > s. > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle < > stephen.degabrie...@acm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just tried making a instance of insert-large-letters as a tool. I just >> copied the code and added the tools stuff. >> >> Seemed to work OK, but >> - I turned it into normal racket as I didn't have time to learn typed >> racket. >> - I'm not confident enough with the core of DrRacket to remove the >> 'insert-large-letters' code without messing something else up. >> >> I'm doing this as a learning exercise for the tools, but I may try >> get-defns[1] and module browser[2] at some point. >> >> [1] personally not a big fan of drop down menus - I like the tree thingy >> you see in other IDEs >> [2] to make Dr start quicker on slow machines. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Stephen >> >> >> -- >> Stephen De Gabrielle <http://www.degabrielle.name/stephen> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Robby Findler < >> ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure the module browser was before the plugin api, but probably >>> it wasn't. I think all three of those could be tools, but it is an accident >>> of history (and of who implemented them...) that they aren't. Probably they >>> should be. We might even save some startup time by disabling the module >>> browser. >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle < >>> stephen.degabrie...@acm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> looking through the source I've noticed the module browser is not a >>>> tool, I'm guessing this is because it preceded the introduction of the >>>> plugins mechanism? >>>> >>>> Check Syntax is a tool, but insert-large-letters.rkt and get-defn's >>>> are not? >>>> >>>> is there a defined criteria? or is the arrangement historic/ >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> >>>> Stephen >>>> >>>> >>>> _________________________ >>>> Racket Developers list: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
