It would be nice if it implied some consistent default, depending on
what I generally want. Ie, I can be someone who just want the minimum
-libs, or someone who always wants everything including the -tests.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X" imply pa... Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X" imp... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X"... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X&q... Neil Toronto
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-dev] should package ... Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
- Re: [racket-dev] should pack... Greg Hendershott
- Re: [racket-dev] should package ... Matthew Flatt
- Re: [racket-dev] should pack... Neil Van Dyke
- Re: [racket-dev] should pack... Matthew Flatt
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X" imply pa... Eli Barzilay
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X" imp... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X"... Eli Barzilay
- Re: [racket-dev] should package "X&q... Matthew Flatt

