On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Eric Dobson <eric.n.dob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The changes shouldn't see too much improvement on structs since struct > contracts are still expensive and I don't think it is possible to > elide them safely with rackets introspection features (but I may be > wrong about that, but it requires heavy thinking).
If we know that (a) the struct type has all concrete types (ie, it isn't polymorphic) and (b) it contains no higher-order values and (c) we know that it has no substructs then we could do better. Currently, Racket has no way to express (c), but I hope we can address that eventually. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
