Credit for this discovery goes to Jens -- I just wrote the email. Sam On Jul 10, 2014 2:36 AM, "Matthew Flatt" <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> I've pushed a repair. To double-check it, change 1140 to something like > 1340, since the table of primitives changed as part of the repair. > > Thanks for the report! > > At Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:39:50 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > The following exchange with rudybot, which is running the programs in > > a sandbox, demonstrates the issue: > > > > 09:35 <samth> rudybot: eval (let () (local-require compiler/zo-marshal > > compiler/zo-structs racket/fasl) (fasl->s-exp (zo-marshal > > (compilation-top 3 (prefix 0 '() '()) (let-void 1 #t (install-value 1 > > 0 #t (primval 1140) (localref #t 0 #f #f #f ))))))) > > 09:35 <rudybot> samth: ; Value: #<procedure:unsafe-fx+> > > 09:36 <samth> rudybot: eval ((let () (local-require > > compiler/zo-marshal compiler/zo-structs racket/fasl) (fasl->s-exp > > (zo-marshal (compilation-top 3 (prefix 0 '() '()) (let-void 1 #t > > (install-value 1 0 #t (primval 1140) (localref #t 0 #f #f #f ))))))) > > vector-ref vector-ref) > > 09:36 <rudybot> samth: ; Value: 32681168 > > > > The relevant program is: > > > > (let () > > (local-require compiler/zo-marshal compiler/zo-structs racket/fasl) > > (fasl->s-exp (zo-marshal > > (compilation-top 3 > > (prefix 0 '() '()) > > (let-void 1 #t (install-value 1 0 #t (primval > > 1140) (localref #t 0 #f #f #f ))))))) > > > > Sam > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
