At Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
> argument that flattens all the way down?
>
> I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in
> compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all?
> argument.
I don't think so. Eagerly flattening would break examples like
(begin
(define begin +)
(begin 1 2)))
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
