On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jay McCarthy <j...@racket-lang.org> wrote: > I need to revert this because it horribly breaks the bootstrapping > phase. It may be possible to make the core have a package in the > future, but it's not an easy change.
Is this because code expects #f instead of "base"? Or for some other reason? Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
