I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
adding aliases.

Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
write an essay specifically aimed there?

  - Step 1: use variables.
  - Step 2: here are `for` loops!

;)

Robby


On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Alexis King <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was just thinking today that I would, for example, find it useful to have
> a (zip ...) function in racket/list that would be equivalent to (map list
> ...). Users coming from a Haskell background might even find it useful to
> have a zip-with function that is simply an alias for map. Admittedly, these
> are rather trivial, but (especially in the first case) I think they’d still
> be useful.
>
> I am all for avoiding feature creep and code bloat, but Racket’s “batteries
> included” approach seems to make functions like these prime candidates for
> libraries like racket/list. As long as they’re not in racket/base, they seem
> fairly harmless, especially considering they would only be needed at
> compile-time.
>
> Should I even consider adding things like this, or is the consensus that the
> libraries are mostly sufficient as-is?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5D941DB1-8A55-4A41-98A2-A3BE1BFE6D40%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAL3TdONpdpZX%3D63ZtmPxTytPfw_PrL6gR6dwQXcbnS5_cB2OcQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to