-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62490/#review186105
-----------------------------------------------------------
The following codes should be modified:
1. `if(this.dataMaskPolicyAllowItemExceptions ==
dataMaskPolicyAllowItemExceptions) {` in
`setDataMaskPolicyAllowItemExceptions(` for RangerPolicy.java
2. `if(this.dataMaskPolicyDenyItems == dataMaskPolicyDenyItems) {` in `public
void setDataMaskPolicyDenyItems(` for RangerPolicy.java
3. `if(this.dataMaskPolicyDenyItemExceptions ==
dataMaskPolicyDenyItemExceptions) {` in `public void
setDataMaskPolicyDenyItemExceptions(` for RangerPolicy.java
Please fix them.
- Qiang Zhang
On 九月 25, 2017, 3:30 a.m., pengjianhua wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62490/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 九月 25, 2017, 3:30 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Colm O
> hEigeartaigh, Gautam Borad, Madhan Neethiraj, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan
> Neethiraj, Velmurugan Periasamy, and Qiang Zhang.
>
>
> Bugs: RANGER-1796
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1796
>
>
> Repository: ranger
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Masking policy for hive should support for deny/allowException/denyExceptions
> to meet further business needs. Such as masking policy for hive should
> support as following scene and so on:
> USER1, USER2 and USER3 belong to the user group GROUPA. Select GROUPA group
> when created masking policy. The USER1 does not use masking and USER2, USER3
> need masking.
>
> We rigorously tested this issue. The test result shows that the feature is ok.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/RangerPolicy.java
> 60daed9
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/validation/RangerPolicyValidator.java
> 0b5fc0e
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerPolicyRepository.java
> 067ca04
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerDefaultPolicyEvaluator.java
> f5d7ad3
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerOptimizedPolicyEvaluator.java
> 47b4921
>
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerPolicyItemEvaluator.java
> edbde29
>
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/RangerPolicyRetriever.java
> 1b6f440
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java
> da65074
>
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/RangerPolicyService.java
> f55a103
> security-admin/src/main/webapp/scripts/utils/XAUtils.js ecf43ad
> security-admin/src/main/webapp/scripts/views/policies/RangerPolicyForm.js
> 9a8d82d
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62490/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> tested it
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> pengjianhua
>
>
