-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63608/#review190284
-----------------------------------------------------------



Looks good to me. Just a few trivial changes:

a) In getRandomLinkName and getRandomJobName there is no need to store the 
variable - just return it directly, e.g. return 
RandomStringUtils.randomAlphanumeric(10) + "-link";
b) Change new ArrayList<String>() to new ArrayList<>()

- Colm O hEigeartaigh


On Nov. 7, 2017, 6:56 a.m., Qiang Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63608/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 7, 2017, 6:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Colm O 
> hEigeartaigh, Gautam Borad, Madhan Neethiraj, pengjianhua, Ramesh Mani, 
> Selvamohan Neethiraj, sam  rome, Venkat Ranganathan, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1830
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1830
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Write unit test for RANGER-1810 sqoop plugin
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   plugin-sqoop/pom.xml 0c52e66 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/authorization/sqoop/authorizer/RangerAdminClientImpl.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/test/java/org/apache/ranger/authorization/sqoop/authorizer/RangerSqoopAuthorizerTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   plugin-sqoop/src/test/resources/log4j.properties PRE-CREATION 
>   plugin-sqoop/src/test/resources/ranger-sqoop-security.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   plugin-sqoop/src/test/resources/sqoop-policies.json PRE-CREATION 
>   plugin-sqoop/src/test/resources/sqoop.properties PRE-CREATION 
>   plugin-sqoop/src/test/resources/sqoop_bootstrap.properties PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63608/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qiang Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to