> On 十一月 17, 2017, 4:58 p.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> > I think the Commons Collections 4 dependency should be avoided as it is not 
> > really required.

OK, thanks.


- Qiang


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63867/#review191359
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 十一月 20, 2017, 8:13 a.m., Qiang Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63867/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 十一月 20, 2017, 8:13 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Don Bosco Durai, Colm O 
> hEigeartaigh, Gautam Borad, Madhan Neethiraj, pengjianhua, Ramesh Mani, 
> Selvamohan Neethiraj, sam  rome, Venkat Ranganathan, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1848
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1848
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Implement getLinkList/getJobList in SqoopClient for Ranger Sqoop2 plugin.
> It affects link and job resource lookup when creating sqoop policy in 
> RangerAdmin.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/services/sqoop/client/SqoopClient.java
>  640d5db 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/services/sqoop/client/json/model/SqoopJobResponse.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/services/sqoop/client/json/model/SqoopJobsResponse.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/services/sqoop/client/json/model/SqoopLinkResponse.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> plugin-sqoop/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/services/sqoop/client/json/model/SqoopLinksResponse.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63867/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested sqoop link and job resource lookup.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qiang Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to