Sounds good, thanks!

Colm.

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Madhan Neethiraj <mad...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Colm,
>
> Atlas team is in the process of releasing 1.0.0-alpha, which should go out
> next week. Once this release is out, Atlas team will get started on 0.8.2
> release; and this release should go out by end of the month.
>
> Thanks,
> Madhan
>
>
>
>
> On 1/19/18, 6:42 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Are the Atlas team still planning on releasing 0.8.2 by the end of the
>     month? Are there features we need currently missing on the relevant
> branch
>     in Atlas?
>
>     Colm.
>
>     On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Velmurugan Periasamy <v...@apache.org>
>     wrote:
>
>     > +1
>     >
>     > Another suggestion. Atlas is in the process
>     > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f72ccbc48515ff5ea9a3a8832bd298
> 7d19573069eec90984d9d71277@%3Cdev.atlas.apache.org%3E>
>     > of releasing 1.0.0-alpha. Once this is complete, Ranger 1.0.0-alpha
> can be
>     > released based on that. Atlas team can be requested to back port any
>     > changes in Ranger/Atlas interface to 0.8.2, which can be used for
> Ranger
>     > 1.0.0.
>     >
>     > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > Reply-To: "dev@ranger.apache.org" <dev@ranger.apache.org>, "
>     > cohei...@apache.org" <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 10:40 AM
>     > To: Abhay Kulkarni <akulka...@hortonworks.com>
>     > Cc: "dev@ranger.apache.org" <dev@ranger.apache.org>, Ramesh Mani <
>     > rm...@hortonworks.com>
>     >
>     > Subject: Re: Hadoop 3 support
>     >
>     > +1 for this suggestion. Will there be any issue with downgrading
> Atlas in
>     > Ranger from the current 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version?
>     >
>     > Colm.
>     >
>     > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Abhay Kulkarni <
> akulka...@hortonworks.com
>     > >
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     > All,
>     >
>     > Here is another proposal for Ranger release 1.0.0.
>     >
>     > Atlas team is planning to make a Atlas-0.8.2 release towards the end
> of
>     > this month. Once that is done, Ranger can do release 1.0.0 with
> dependency
>     > on Atlas 0.8.2 (without Hadoop 3.0.0).
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > -Abhay
>     >
>     > On 1/8/18, 12:23 PM, "Velmurugan Periasamy" <
> vperias...@hortonworks.com on
>     > behalf of v...@apache.org> wrote:
>     >
>     > >+1 for getting the 1.0.0 release out soon.
>     > >
>     > >From:  Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > >Reply-To:  "dev@ranger.apache.org" <dev@ranger.apache.org>,
>     > >"cohei...@apache.org" <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > >Date:  Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:37 PM
>     > >To:  Ramesh Mani <rm...@hortonworks.com>
>     > >Cc:  "dev@ranger.apache.org" <dev@ranger.apache.org>
>     > >Subject:  Re: Hadoop 3 support
>     > >
>     > >OK thanks. I will test the patch a bit more thoroughly before
> submitting
>     > >for a RR.
>     > >
>     > >Just in regards as to whether to release 1.0.0 with or without
> Hadoop
>     > >3.0.0...currently we have a dependency on Atlas 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> What's the
>     > >timeline for releasing this? That would be the only thing blocking
> getting
>     > >a 1.0.0 of Ranger out "quickly". If that's not imminent then I
> guess that
>     > >gives us the time to get Ranger 1.0.0 out with Hadoop 3.0.0 support.
>     > >
>     > >However, it's been ages since the last release so we should
> probably not
>     > >wait too long before getting a release out.
>     > >
>     > >Colm.
>     > >
>     > >On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Ramesh Mani <rm...@hortonworks.com>
>     > wrote:
>     > >
>     > >>  Thanks Colm,
>     > >>
>     > >>  I am fine with Option 1 or 3.  Do you want to create a RR for
> this
>     > >>patch?
>     > >>
>     > >>  Thanks,
>     > >>  Ramesh
>     > >>
>     > >>  From: Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > >>  Reply-To: "cohei...@apache.org" <cohei...@apache.org>
>     > >>  Date: Friday, January 5, 2018 at 4:19 AM
>     > >>  To: Ramesh Mani <rm...@hortonworks.com>
>     > >>  Cc: "dev@ranger.apache.org" <dev@ranger.apache.org>
>     > >>  Subject: Re: Hadoop 3 support
>     > >>
>     > >>  I should have added - a third option is just not to support
> Hadoop
>     > >>3.0.0
>     > >>  at all in Ranger 1.0.0 - but to release Ranger 1.0.0 soon and
> then
>     > >>update
>     > >>  to Hadoop 3.0.0 in Ranger 1.1/2.0 etc.
>     > >>
>     > >>  Colm.
>     > >>
>     > >>  On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     > >><cohei...@apache.org>
>     > >>  wrote:
>     > >>
>     > >>>  Hi Ramesh,
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  Yes, the Ranger core will depend on Hadoop 3.0.0, and the HDFS
> + Yarn
>     > >>>  plugins will support Hadoop 3.0.0 only. There is no other
> option due
>     > >>>to API
>     > >>>  changes. A user can use the earlier plugins from 0.7.x if
> support for
>     > >>>  Hadoop 2.7.x is required.
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  I am not really tied to this approach though - I'm also fine
> with just
>     > >>>  having new plugins to support Hadoop 3.0.0 and Yarn 3.0.0. The
>     > >>>approach to
>     > >>>  update all of Ranger to use Hadoop 3.0.0 was based on the
> comments on
>     > >>>this
>     > >>>  JIRA:
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1738
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  Colm.
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Ramesh Mani <
> rm...@hortonworks.com>
>     > >>>  wrote:
>     > >>>
>     > >>>>  Colm,
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>  Is this proposal is to have Ranger 1.0.0 support Hadoop 3.0.0
> only?
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>  Thanks.
>     > >>>>  Ramesh
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>  On 1/4/18, 9:32 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <cohei...@apache.org
> >
>     > >>>>wrote:
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>>  >Hi Ranger devs,
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >I posted an initial patch here to bump Ranger up to use
> Hadoop
>     > >>>>>3.0.0:
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1935
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >I would appreciate some initial feedback before proceeding
> further
>     > >>>>>with
>     > >>>>>  >testing it (just a general "looks ok" or "this would be
> problematic
>     > >>>>>  >because
>     > >>>>>  >X").
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >Colm.
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >--
>     > >>>>>  >Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     > >>>>>  >
>     > >>>>>  >Talend Community Coder
>     > >>>>>  >http://coders.talend.com
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>>
>     > >>>
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  --
>     > >>>  Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     > >>>
>     > >>>  Talend Community Coder
>     > >>>  http://coders.talend.com
>     > >>>
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     > >>  --
>     > >>  Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     > >>
>     > >>  Talend Community Coder
>     > >>  http://coders.talend.com
>     > >>
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >--
>     > >Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     > >
>     > >Talend Community Coder
>     > >http://coders.talend.com
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Colm O hEigeartaigh
>     >
>     > Talend Community Coder
>     > http://coders.talend.com
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     --
>     Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
>     Talend Community Coder
>     http://coders.talend.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to