-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72325/#review220280
-----------------------------------------------------------




security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/ServiceRESTUtil.java
Line 880 (original), 999 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72325/#comment308614>

    if this is not required, the please remove it.


- Pradeep Agrawal


On April 9, 2020, 1:25 p.m., Dineshkumar Yadav wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72325/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 9, 2020, 1:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Gautam Borad, Kishor Gollapalliwar, 
> Abhay Kulkarni, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Vishal Suvagia, and Velmurugan 
> Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Handling the scenario when non-existing policy send with mergeIfExist=true
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/ServiceREST.java 
> 38b49820b 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/ServiceRESTUtil.java 
> d85028c95 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72325/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test case:
> 
> Creating non-existing policy with below param
> a) mergeIfExists=true
> b) serviceName
> c) policyName
> 
> Expected: New policy should be created.
> 
> Creating policy with below param and role which is already exist
> a) mergeIfExists=true
> b) serviceName
> c) policyName
> 
> Expected: role should get merged.
> 
> Creating policy with below param and policy condition in kafka service which 
> is already exist
> a) mergeIfExists=true
> b) serviceName
> c) policyName
> 
> Expected: condition should get merged.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dineshkumar Yadav
> 
>

Reply via email to