-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/73734/#review223779
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Kishor Gollapalliwar


On Nov. 30, 2021, 1:36 p.m., Mateen Mansoori wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/73734/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 30, 2021, 1:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Dhaval Shah, Dineshkumar Yadav, Jayendra Parab, 
> Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Mahesh Bandal, Mehul Parikh, Mugdha 
> Varadkar, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan 
> Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3528
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3528
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Tried to create a test service in HDFS and provided below configs :
> "default-policy.1.policyItem.1.group" and provided value as 'grp1'
> 
> The group provided in this config "default-policy.1.policyItem.1.groups" gets 
> created but its audit is not shown in the Admin Tab.
> 
> Same issue occurs when
> 1) used - "default.policy.groups" config during service creation
> 2) used - "ranger.default.policy.groups" config in ranger-admin-site.xml
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 
> cb57b9913 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/73734/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> RAN : mvn clean compile test verify install build succeeded.
> 
> Testing : Tested on local VM
> Tested by providing the below configs and values: 
>  1.) "default-policy.1.policyItem.1.group" in service config
>  2.) "default.policy.groups" in service config
>  3.) "ranger.default.policy.groups" config in ranger-admin-site.xml
>  In all the cases audits are shown for the created groups.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mateen Mansoori
> 
>

Reply via email to