> On Dec. 10, 2021, 4:20 a.m., Pradeep Agrawal wrote: > > What if we keep both ? > > bhavik patel wrote: > Spotbugs is developed on top Findbugs so keeping both it's not good idea. > > Pradeep Agrawal wrote: > That i know, I wanted to know that whether anything has been > removed/deprecated from Spotbugs which was already there in Findbugs
Nothing like that but on top of that additional checks are added. - bhavik ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72941/#review223830 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 8, 2021, 8:03 a.m., bhavik patel wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/72941/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 8, 2021, 8:03 a.m.) > > > Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Dhaval Shah, Dineshkumar Yadav, > Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep > Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy. > > > Bugs: RANGER-3030 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3030 > > > Repository: ranger > > > Description > ------- > > Since Findbugs is no longer maintained, so it will be good to use the latest > version of the Spotbugs Maven plugin as a part of good coding practice. > > > Diffs > ----- > > dev-support/findbugsIncludeFile.xml 8623906bd > dev-support/spotbugsIncludeFile.xml PRE-CREATION > pom.xml 11a695065 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72941/diff/3/ > > > Testing > ------- > > erified "mvn spotbugs:check" successful. > > > Thanks, > > bhavik patel > >
