-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74232/#review224966
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Madhan Neethiraj


On Dec. 6, 2022, 10:28 p.m., Abhay Kulkarni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74232/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 6, 2022, 10:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, madhan, Madhan Neethiraj, Ramesh Mani, Sailaja 
> Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3999
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3999
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If a user-initiated operation requires checking if more than one permission 
> is granted, then currently, each permission requires a call to internal 
> Policy Engine API for the same accessed resource. This leads to many 
> repetitive computations which may be avoided if the policy engine API 
> supports multiple permissions. In that case, optimization may be achieved by 
> pushing authorization for multiple permissions down to the lowest possible 
> level.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerAccessRequestWrapper.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerPolicyEngineImpl.java
>  23db18f3a 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerDefaultPolicyEvaluator.java
>  520ddf865 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyevaluator/RangerOptimizedPolicyEvaluator.java
>  d3fc27d7d 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerAccessRequestUtil.java
>  df03ed1c4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74232/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Passed all existing unit tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abhay Kulkarni
> 
>

Reply via email to