-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74683/#review225875
-----------------------------------------------------------




agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerAccessRequestUtil.java
Lines 278 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/74683/#comment314286>

    Nit pick: No need of null check, instanceof should be enough.


- Ramesh Mani


On Oct. 19, 2023, 3:49 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74683/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2023, 3:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Abhay Kulkarni, Ramesh Mani, and 
> Subhrat Chaudhary.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-4484
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-4484
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - updated RangerDefaultRequestProcessor.preProcess() to compute 
> security-zones for the accessed resource and store in context
> - updated policy evaluation paths to obtain security-zone from the context, 
> instead of computing
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/PolicyEngine.java
>  3373dbae9 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerPolicyEngineImpl.java
>  fd78fd8e0 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/policyengine/RangerRequestScriptEvaluator.java
>  0df8686e3 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/service/RangerDefaultRequestProcessor.java
>  6fa75d602 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/RangerAccessRequestUtil.java
>  b505f495b 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/RangerPolicyAdminImpl.java 
> 6799be200 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74683/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - verified that all tests pass successfully
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Madhan Neethiraj
> 
>

Reply via email to