Hi,

I’m preparing the Apache Ranger 2.9.0 release (RM for RANGER-5670). Branch
lock is done on ranger-2.9; RELEASE_NOTES are ready. I need the 2.9.0
Confluence release folder published on cwiki, matching the 2.8.0 layout
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/RANGER/pages/406620843/2.8.0+release+-+Apache+Ranger>
.

could a RANGER space admin add my wiki user ramackri to the committer edit
group (or grant Add page permission on the RANGER space)? I can login but
get 403 when creating release pages under Release Folders.
Regards,

Ram

On Sat, Jul 11, 2026 at 8:59 AM Ramachandran Krishnan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
> The ranger-2.9 branch is now locked for the Apache Ranger 2.9.0 release.
> After this notice, only blocker or critical fixes will be considered for
> ranger-2.9, and those require PMC approval.
> Planned schedule:
> - Jul 11 (evening): version bump to 2.9.0
> - Jul 12: RC0 build, sign, upload, [VOTE] email (72 hours)
> - Jul 17: GA target
> Release tracking: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-5670
> Thanks,
> Ram
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 10:46 AM Ramachandran Krishnan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Apache Ranger 2.9.0 release work has started. We plan to lock the
>> ranger-2.9
>> branch tomorrow (Jul 11, 2026), cut RC0 on Jul 12, and target GA on Jul
>> 17.
>> If you have any open pull requests or fixes intended for 2.9.0, please
>> ensure
>> they are raised against ranger-2.9 and reviewed by end of day today (Jul
>> 10).
>> After branch lock, only blocker or critical fixes will be considered, and
>> those require PMC approval.
>> Please speak up today if you need a change included in 2.9.0. Otherwise we
>> will proceed with branch lock and RC0 on schedule.
>> Release tracking: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-5670
>> Thanks,
>> Ramachandran Krishnan
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 8:12 PM Ramachandran Krishnan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi PMC,
>>> I've added my PGP key for Ranger 2.9.0 RM to dist/dev/ranger/KEYS
>>> (revision 85777, key ID D49DAD7F7A2F45BC, [email protected]).
>>> Could a PMC member please copy it to dist/release/ranger/KEYS before
>>> RC0 vote on Jul 12?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ram
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 4:34 PM Ramachandran Krishnan <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rangers,
>>>>
>>>> I am volunteering as Release Manager for Apache Ranger 2.9.0. Here is
>>>> the proposed release plan:
>>>>
>>>>    1.
>>>>
>>>>    *Branch:* The ranger-2.9 branch will be used for this release.
>>>>    2.
>>>>
>>>>    *Jul-11, Friday:* The release branch will be closed for commits.
>>>>    Any commits after this date will require explicit approval from a PMC
>>>>    member.
>>>>    3.
>>>>
>>>>    *Jul-12, Saturday:* Release Candidate #0 (RC0) will be cut and put
>>>>    up for a community vote.
>>>>    4.
>>>>
>>>>    *Jul-15, Tuesday:* Tentative completion of the vote (observing the
>>>>    72-hour minimum).
>>>>    5.
>>>>
>>>>    *Jul-17, Thursday:* Tentative official release date.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to include any fixes or updates in the 2.9.0 release,
>>>> please make sure they land in the ranger-2.9 branch by *Friday, July
>>>> 11*.
>>>>
>>>> Please object if you see issues with the timeline above, or flag any
>>>> blocker tickets that must land before the branch lock.
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    *Release process documentation:*
>>>>    https://apache.github.io/ranger/project/release-process/
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to your support in getting Apache Ranger 2.9.0 out as
>>>> planned.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> *Ramachandran Krishnan*
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 3:12 PM Ramachandran Krishnan <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2026/07/08 09:40:32 Ramachandran Krishnan wrote:
>>>>> > sure Madhan
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 2026/07/06 23:30:46 Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
>>>>> > > Ram,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thank you for volunteering to be the release manager for 2.9.0.
>>>>> Please review release process details at
>>>>> https://apache.github.io/ranger/project/release-process/. Let's
>>>>> target the release by July-17, which would require the release branch to 
>>>>> be
>>>>> locked by end of this week.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thanks,
>>>>> > > Madhan
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On 7/3/26, 9:52 AM, "Ramachandran Krishnan" <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hi,
>>>>> > > If the 2.9 release lead is not yet decided then I would like to
>>>>> take this
>>>>> > > opportunity. I want to learn about the background process of a
>>>>> release.
>>>>> > > Regards,
>>>>> > > Ram
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On 2026/06/08 17:15:56 Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
>>>>> > > > Rangers,
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > I propose we target 2.9.0 release for June-30. Please share your
>>>>> thoughts.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Thanks,
>>>>> > > > Madhan
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On 4/28/26, 12:35 PM, "Madhan Neethiraj" <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Rangers,
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > The community has added 30+ commits since 2.8.0 release couple
>>>>> of months back, including the following:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > - PDP (policy decision point) server implementation
>>>>> > > > - PDP client in Python and Java
>>>>> > > > - support for HTTP header-based authentication
>>>>> > > > - reduced library dependency for ranger-plugins-common library
>>>>> > > > - tagsync update to support Trino
>>>>> > > > - Polaris service-def updates
>>>>> > > > - dependent components version updates
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > I propose we get started on next release, Apache Ranger 2.9.0,
>>>>> to include above updates, with tentative release date of May-15. If you
>>>>> would like to include any fixes or enhancements in this release, please
>>>>> align with this timeline.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Thanks,
>>>>> > > > Madhan
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to