Hi Xinyu,
Thanks a lot for preparing the release! Could you fix the typo in the
subject ("rc1" -> "rc0") resend the email in order to avoid confusion? In
case we need another rc, we may call it "rc2".
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:02 AM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems that the version numbering is incorrect; it should start from rc0
> (the index of the first element in an array is 0, not 1—sorry about that).
> You can consider this as a vote for rc0.
>
> On 2024/09/03 13:59:10 Xinyu Tan wrote:
> > Hi Ratis community,
> >
> > I’m calling a vote For Apache Ratis Release 3.1.1 rc0.
> >
> > The git tag to be vote upon:
> > https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-3.1.1-rc0
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> > 3fc434c776e6d3a6c0da6e38c4a286cfcb7dc7f1
> >
> > The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/3.1.1/-rc0/
> >
> > Fingerprint of the GPG key release artifacts are signed with:
> > 055D2E860E43CBB155D09AA4BECD7978EE4DA7BC
> >
> > My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1149/
> >
> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > Please vote on releasing this ratis-3.1.1-rc0. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] 0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Starting with my +1
> > - Verified checksums, signatures and git hash.
> > - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
> > - Compared the files in src tarball with the files at the given git tag.
> > - Built from source.
> > - Ran regular Ratis CI:
> https://github.com/apache/ratis/actions/runs/10680694232
> >
> > This is my first time releasing a version. If there are any mistakes, I
> kindly ask for your feedback.
> >
> > Best
> > -------------------
> > Xinyu Tan
> >
>
