Xinyu, How about we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2155 "Add a builder for RatisShell" ? It is a simple change to allow RatisShell to be used programmatically.
Ethan, thanks for the suggestion! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 7:35 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Tsz-Wo and Ethan > > I have merged ratis2149,ratis2148,ratis2154,ratis2152 and ratis2150 to > release-3.1.1[1]. > > Now only ratis2147 issue wants to come in, we can review this PR as soon > as possible. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/commits/release-3.1.1 > [2] https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/1142 > > Best > ------------- > Xinyu Tan > > On 2024/09/12 15:45:16 Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Hi Xinyu, > > > > That's a good idea! We should include the latest bug fixes. > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:33 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, Attila and Tsz-Wo > > > > > > Since we are re-sending an rc3, I think we can definitely include > > > ratis2153 and ratis2150. > > > > > > In addition, ratis2148 and ratis2149 fixed by we IoTDB team regarding > > > membership changes have also been merged and feel able to be included. > > > > > > In addition, ratis 2138 has not been merged yet, but it is also a > problem, > > > does this need to be merged into master as soon as possible? > > > > > > Best > > > -------------- > > > Xinyu Tan > > > > > > On 2024/09/10 07:33:36 Attila Doroszlai wrote: > > > > > Do we need to release a rc3 for this? If so, maybe we need to add > > > several new commits. If not, I will continue the release process > > > > > > > > Yes, we need a new RC for this. Otherwise build from source release > > > > will be different than build from git repo. > > > > > > > > RATIS-2153 is now merged and cherry-picked to branch release-3.1.1. > > > > > > > > -Attila > > > > > > > > > >
