+1

- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git.

By ignoring the .git* files and the files in ratis-experiments, the
following are the files found in git that the tarball does not have.  It is
correct to exclude these files.
SOURCE_NOT_EXIST: rm "ratis/.asf.yaml"
SOURCE_NOT_EXIST: rm "ratis/.idea/vcs.xml"
SOURCE_NOT_EXIST: rm "ratis/DEPLOY.md"

- Built from source successfully.
- Passed all unit tests.

https://github.com/szetszwo/ratis/actions/runs/10945906078

- Able to run examples and shell with the bin tarball.

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2160 for a minor
improvement of shell output.

Thanks Xinyu for preparing the release!

Tsz-Wo


On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:27 AM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ratis community,
>
> I’m calling a vote For Apache Ratis Release 3.1.1 rc3.
>
> The git tag to be vote upon:
> https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-3.1.1-rc3
>
> The git commit hash:
> 45a30d890451a44ec918fdee2732c5fff80ea17c
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/3.1.1/rc3
>
> Fingerprint of the GPG key release artifacts are signed with:
> 055D2E860E43CBB155D09AA4BECD7978EE4DA7BC
>
> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts are staged at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1152
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> Please vote on releasing this ratis-3.1.1-rc3. Thanks in advance.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1
> - Verified checksums, signatures and git hash.
> - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
> - Compared the files in src tarball with the files at the given git tag.
> - Built from source.
> - Ran regular Ratis CI. [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/actions/runs/10936817817
>

Reply via email to