+1

- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Compared the files in the src tarball with the files in git.

Found that the maven-wrapper.properties is in the tarball but not in
git.  It seems not a release blocker since the file just has two mvn
URLs and it  has license header.
DESTINATION_NOT_EXIST: cp
"apache-ratis-3.1.3-src/.mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.properties"
"../git-ratis/.mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.properties"

- Built from source successfully.
- Passed all unit tests.

https://github.com/szetszwo/ratis/actions/runs/12735334935

- Able to run examples and shell with the bin tarball.

2025-01-12 08:47:59 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-1: a = 3 = 3

2025-01-12 08:49:27 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-5: b = (a * a) = 9

2025-01-12 08:49:53 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-7: NEW = (b * b) = 81

2025-01-12 08:50:30 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-9: c = 5 = 5

2025-01-12 08:51:04 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-13: YEAR = (c * c) = 25

2025-01-12 08:51:21 INFO  StateMachine:181 - LEADER:n2-15: HAPPY =
(NEW * YEAR) = 2025
William, thanks a lot for working on the release!


Tsz-Wo


On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 6:52 PM William Song <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi community,
>
> I’m calling a vote For Apache Ratis Release 3.1.3 rc2.
>
> The git tag to be vote upon:
> https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-3.1.3-rc2
>
> The git commit hash:
> a84a924f4d698b40961b6e943b6b4f2b1258090c
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/3.1.3/rc2
>
> Fingerprint of the GPG key release artifacts are signed with:
> DCE2C33D41C62578969DBAFE37D6ECF84E78BC92
>
> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS
>
> Maven artifacts are staged at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1164
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> Please vote on releasing this ratis-3.1.3-rc2. Thanks in advance.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1
> - Verified checksums, signatures and git hash.
> - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE.
> - Compared the files in src tarball with the files at the given git tag.
> - Built from source.
> - Ran regular Ratis CI. [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/actions/runs/12702154375

Reply via email to