Hi Xinyu, Sounds good. BTW, we should call 3.2.1 a maintenance release. Thanks for working on that!
Tsz-Wo On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 9:31 PM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Since IoTDB needs a stable release version. I can see that we already have > 6 commits after 3.2.0, maybe we can release a minor version 3.2.1? And I am > willing to act as the release manager. > > Best > ----------------- > Xinyu Tan > > On 2025/08/25 08:51:01 Tian Jiang wrote: > > Dear Apache Ratis developers, > > > > > > Greetings, I am a committer from Apache IoTDB, which has constantly > found Ratis very essential in building a reliable consensus in our > timeseries DBMS. > > Throughout the process of using Ratis, we also experienced some issues > and felt honored to contribute to the Ratis community, like: > > https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/1280 > > https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/1274 > > > > > > IoTDB is about to have its next release, and you guys know that > according to the Apache policy, no snapshot dependency is allowed in a > release. > > Therefore, we sincerely hope that Ratis may provide a release in a near > future including those fixes. > > > > > > Many appreciates, > > Tian Jiang >
