Marton,

Thanks for checking.  I agree that the difference seems not a problem
since the fingerprints are the same.

Tsz-Wo

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Elek, Marton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not a gpg expert but downloaded both of them and checked with 'gpg
> --list-packages filename'.
>
> The only difference is that the KEYS version has an additional signature
> from Owen:
>
> :signature packet: algo 1, keyid 78434EF460D6914B
>         version 4, created 1462223114, md5len 0, sigclass 0x13
>         digest algo 10, begin of digest e8 2d
>         hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-05-02)
>         hashed subpkt 27 len 1 (key flags: 03)
>         hashed subpkt 11 len 4 (pref-sym-algos: 9 8 7 3)
>         hashed subpkt 21 len 4 (pref-hash-algos: 10 9 8 11)
>         hashed subpkt 22 len 4 (pref-zip-algos: 2 3 1 0)
>         hashed subpkt 30 len 1 (features: 01)
>         hashed subpkt 23 len 1 (keyserver preferences: 80)
>         subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID 78434EF460D6914B)
>         data: [4095 bits]
>
> A more simple signature (by Owen) is contained by both:
>
> # off=2203 ctb=89 tag=2 hlen=3 plen=543
> :signature packet: algo 1, keyid 78434EF460D6914B
>         version 4, created 1462223114, md5len 0, sigclass 0x18
>         digest algo 10, begin of digest 30 e2
>         hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-05-02)
>         hashed subpkt 27 len 1 (key flags: 0C)
>         subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID 78434EF460D6914B)
>         data: [4092 bits]
>
>
> IMHO it's not a problem just a redundant signature data. (or not redundat as
> he key flags are different).
>
> Marton
>
>
>
>
> On 05/08/2018 12:59 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>>
>> Marton,
>>
>> I compared you keys in two locations below
>> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
>> -
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&fingerprint=on&search=0x78434EF460D6914B
>>
>> They somehow look different.  They match until "Zz6JA".  Do you know why?
>>
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Elek, Marton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0.
>>>
>>> This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120
>>> improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This is
>>> the
>>> first release
>>> which includes a binary package with ready to use example project.
>>>
>>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>> found at:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc0/
>>>
>>> Staged artifacts can be found at:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1003/
>>>
>>>
>>> This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
>>> [email protected], which is included in the repository's KEYS file
>>> (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).
>>>
>>> This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
>>>
>>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0EE79B28
>>>
>>> Or in the apache phonebook:
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc
>>>
>>>
>>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc0
>>> (ee4936d)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> If the vote passed, the second stage vote will be called on the Apache
>>> incubator mailing list to get approval from the Incubator PMC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   # Review/testing
>>>
>>> You can check the usual requirements of an apache release:
>>>
>>>   • Signatures
>>>   • Checksums
>>>   • License and notice files
>>>   • Disclaimer file (incubator!)
>>>   • Build the project from the source code package (mvn clean install
>>> assembly:single -DskipTests=true )
>>>   • Licence headers
>>>
>>> The binary papckage can be smoketested with:
>>>
>>> ./examples/bin/start-all.sh
>>> ./examples/bin/client.sh assign --name a --value 2
>>> ./examples/bin/client.sh get --name a
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Starting with my vote: +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marton

Reply via email to