> On 2012-04-16 19:31:07, mfranklin wrote:
> > trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/script/rave.js, line 418
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4739/diff/1/?file=102150#file102150line418>
> >
> >     Why is this return statement commented out?

The behavior is not currently defined in the case that a user takes an action 
to open multiple instances of a singleton popup. For example the slideout popup 
- it does not make sense to have multiple slideouts open at a time. But nothing 
prevents a user from clicking to open a new slideout while one is already 
active.

We could just replace the old content with the new, we could give a warning, we 
could just ignore the new request.


- Erin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4739/#review6946
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2012-04-16 18:41:14, Erin Noe-Payne wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4739/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-04-16 18:41:14)
> 
> 
> Review request for rave.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Rave 547, 549, 550
> 
> Implement container.views.createElementForGadget to support 
> gadgets.views.openGadget, supporting slideout, modal, and dialog popups.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/rave-demo-gadgets/src/main/webapp/open_views_demo.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/db/initial_data.sql 
> 1326730 
>   trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/script/rave.js 1326730 
>   trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/script/rave_opensocial.js 
> 1326730 
>   
> trunk/rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-client/src/main/java/org/apache/rave/provider/opensocial/config/OpenSocialEnvironment.java
>  1326730 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4739/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Erin
> 
>

Reply via email to