[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13285239#comment-13285239
]
Chris Geer edited comment on RAVE-630 at 5/29/12 11:03 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Based on the "OS Person" != "Rave User" comment [1], does it make more sense to
have Person extend from User instead of User extend from Person as part of this
refactor? I can see a case where you would need a Rave admin account that would
never show up in a social context.
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/rave-dev/201205.mbox/browser
was (Author: geerzo):
Based on the "OS Person" != "Rave User" [1], does it make more sense to
have Person extend from User instead of User extend from Person as part of this
refactor? I can see a case where you would need a Rave admin account that would
never show up in a social context.
[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/rave-dev/201205.mbox/browser
> Refactor Person
> ---------------
>
> Key: RAVE-630
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-630
> Project: Rave
> Issue Type: Technical task
> Reporter: Matt Franklin
> Assignee: Matt Franklin
>
> Refactor Person object and related entitites
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
