On 30 May 2012 17:44, Paul Sharples <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/05/2012 16:08, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > >> Content preview:> >> >> Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------** >> -------------------- >> -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, >> high >> trust >> [140.211.11.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] >> -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay >> >> domain >> -3.0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED RBL: Sender is in Return Path Certified >> (trusted >> relay) >> [Return Path SenderScore Certified (formerly] >> [Bonded Sender) -<http://www.** >> senderscorecertified.com <http://www.senderscorecertified.com>>] >> -2.0 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE RBL: Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted >> relay) >> [Return Path SenderScore Safe List (formerly] >> [Habeas Safelist) -<http://www.** >> senderscorecertified.com <http://www.senderscorecertified.com>>] >> Return-Path: >> dev-return-5463-P.Sharples=bol**[email protected]<[email protected]> >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2012 15:09:06.0689 (UTC) >> FILETIME=[284E3710:01CD3E76] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jasha >>> Joachimsthal >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 10:26 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Team Pages >>> >>> On 30 May 2012 16:10, Sean Cooper<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Is anyone currently working on team pages, or working on defining a >>>> structure for it? >>>> >>>> I'd like to take a crack at defining it this week, but I don't want to >>>> interrupt anyone that might already be working on the problem. >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> I am planning to work on it, but it's not clear yet when. So if you >>> want to >>> start, go ahead :) What I need is a concept of a page that is shared >>> with a >>> group of users, but the users cannot edit the page, only the >>> administrator >>> of the page. See also [1] >>> >> Please add to the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/rave/** >> ArchitectureTopics/PageModel<http://wiki.apache.org/rave/ArchitectureTopics/PageModel> >> > > I've got some changes &improvements I've made to the page sharing facility > (RAVE-103), which probably are relevant to this discussion. > (not team pages yet, but the ability to make shared pages non-editable, > for instance) > Is it okay to commit this or are we too near the next build (i.e. is there > a code freeze yet?) >
There's no code freeze yet, but if you break something now, you have less than 24 hours to fix it ;) Luckily some of the basic features are now covered by the integration tests: http://rave.apache.org/integration-tests.html Jasha > > Paul > > >> [1] >> http://markmail.org/thread/**5dfecb5gk7qynqdc<http://markmail.org/thread/5dfecb5gk7qynqdc> >>> >>> Jasha >>> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5029 - Release Date: 05/28/12 >> >> >> >
