> On Aug. 7, 2012, 10:06 p.m., Chris Geer wrote:
> > trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/static/script/rave.js, line 1287
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6444/diff/1/?file=135322#file135322line1287>
> >
> >     Does it make sense to update the documentation here to describe the 
> > expected/returned object?

I think no? First, that's not consistent with all of the other documentation 
comments in the file. Second, this is providing a reference implementation, but 
the pageOwner / pageViewer objects could contain any custom object based on the 
user implementation.


- Erin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6444/#review9993
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 8, 2012, 1:15 p.m., Erin Noe-Payne wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6444/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 8, 2012, 1:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rave.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds the concept of page viewer and owner to the client at the container 
> level. Page viewer is defined as the authenticated user viewing a page, owner 
> is left to be defined on a per-page basis.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug RAVE-751.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-751
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/views/personProfile.jsp
>  1370376 
>   trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/tags/rave_js.tag 
> 1370376 
>   trunk/rave-portal-resources/src/main/webapp/static/script/rave.js 1370376 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6444/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Erin Noe-Payne
> 
>

Reply via email to