Hi,
On 10/10/2006, at 12:28 AM, Daniel Krech wrote:

>
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Nick Falkner wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Welcome.

Thanks - and also thanks for the timely response.

> <SNIP>

> The required import statement is present in the trunk version. I  
> think the main problem here is that it's been too long since we've  
> cut a new version! I was hoping to cut a new version this weekend,  
> but got side tracked on some other bits. I'll cut 2.3.3 from what's  
> in trunk now ASAP as there are already plenty of bug fixes and  
> features over what's in 2.3.2.

Excellent. I'll look forward to getting my hands on 2.3.3. I've got a  
couple of other minor problems but I'll wait until I've seen 2.3.3  
before I send any more of them to the list.

> It's more likely that rdflib was missing the import in 2.3.2. We'll  
> be taking a cleanup pass through the sparql code soon. Not sure  
> what issues there might be with rdflib on Stackless though... as  
> I'm not sure if anyone has tried it out. Would be interested in  
> knowing how it goes.

So far they appear to behave identically, although I haven't yet used  
rdflib inside microthreads so there may be some difference there.  
I'll keep the list informed if I run across anything unusual.

Thanks again,
Nick.
--
-- Nick Falkner
-- PhD Student
-- Distributed and High Performance Computing Group
-- The University of Adelaide
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to