Daniel Krech wrote: > Hi all, > > As of the last release we included an rdflib_tools top level > package to start gathering some unreleased tools people had around. > This was meant to be a temporary place holder until a separate project > could be created. Any reason not to split these off as a separate > project as planned? Main reason motivating the split now is an issue > that was hit with the debian packaging. > I think it would be good to keep the tools in the main distribution, as examples of rdflib usage. It also has the benefit of making sure the tools are in sync with the current rdflib. The biggest limitation in that case is release logistics, if the tools maintainers are a different group, or the tools themselves get large enough to warrant a separate project, then splitting make sense.
mike > I remember someone telling me they wanted to create such a project, > but don't remember who. Anyone wanting to start and lead such a > project? Else I'm willing to create a project at code.google.com that > we can move the rdflib_tools bits to. > > Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/ > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.snaplogic.org _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
