On 9/14/07, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RDFLib == rdflib.core > RDFLibStore == rdflib.store > RDFLibSPARQL == rdflib.sparql
I like the general idea as well as this particular partitioning. What about rdflib.tools as well? > the one thing that come to mind is that we will need to make a bunch of > module aliases to provide bw compatibility. Ouch, yes - I have no idea how difficult this would be, I've never quite wrapped my head around handling circular module imports in Python > we can still ship an RDFLib package that has all three, just now folks would > have the option of installing and using them independently. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://rdflib.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
