AFAIK The images that were the problem were removed with that commit. There still is the notice file here [0].
I am wondering if [1] needs to be cleaned up too. [0] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/blob/master/assets/server/images/NOTICE [1] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ripple/tree/master/assets/client/images/webworks/bb10 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Horn, Julian C <[email protected]> wrote: > This may or may not be a real problem. Note the following commit comment: > > commit c317ffb1446d821727a453b317fdaf0a7d634d4f > Author: Gord Tanner <[email protected]> > Date: Sun Oct 20 22:37:34 2013 -0400 > > Remove Images that were not able to licence apache. > > When BlackBerry first opensourced Ripple there was some problems > with them open sourcing the images of their phones. I have removed > all the images that BlackBerry put in of their phones and removed the > notice and Readme. > > This should help us get closer to being able to do an Apache release > > Here's a little more background. Originally there was a file named NOTICE > in the assets/client/images folder containing the following text: > > The images and logos provided in this project are proprietary to their > owners, excluded from the Apache 2.0 license, and cannot be used for > any other purpose. > > Note that this wording does not indicate which images are considered > proprietary. Based on Gord's comment, I'm going to guess that he has > reason to believe that it's only the device skins that were actually > considered proprietary. > > Later this NOTICE file was copied to assets/server/images. Later still > the device skins were removed, and the NOTICE file was removed from > assets/client/images, presumably by the above commit. > > Today the NOTICE file remains in assets/server/images, but I believe this > is an oversight. There are no phone images in that folder, only the Ripple > logo. There is a Ripple logo in asserts/client/server, so it follows that > if the files in assets/client/server are now OK then the files in > asserts/server/images are also OK. Therefore the NOTICE file should be > removed from assets/server/images. > > I don't know of my own knowledge whether this removes the last barrier to > doing an Apache release. Gord's comment says his change "gets us closer", > so perhaps that means he has in mind some other cleanup. > > Julian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Why no releases? > > I haven't it right here, but I asked before ages on this list. > I think its pretty much everything which is an image used for letting the > browser look like a phone > > If nobody else here can comment, I will try to find the email from the > archives > > -- > Christian Grobmeier > [email protected] > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 16:46, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > > Thanks Christian. I guess that is something we need to fix. Is there a > > list of these resources that need replacing anywhere handy? > > > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. > > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:34 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Why no releases? > > > > One of the issues I am aware of is that we are not having the right to > > redistribute some images. We need to replace them > > > > -- > > Christian Grobmeier > > [email protected] > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 16:30, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > > > I note that Ripple has not made any releases as yet. Why is this? > > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone >
