+1 > * I verified build works and tests all pass. Yes.
> * I verified license headers with Apache RAT (via 'jake rat’). Yes. > * I manually verified all third party licenses in node_modules. Yes. (Did you mean thirdparty here? Yes to that too.) -- // kai > On Jun 5, 2015, at 15:45, Tim Barham <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sigh... Here's a version without all the extra blank lines that make reading > it practically impossible... > > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.30. > > The package you are voting on is available for review at > http://1drv.ms/1H9yF5h. It was published from its corresponding git tag: > > incubator-ripple: 0.9.30 (7830f1ac70) > > Since this will be an official Apache release of Ripple (another attempt at > our first official release!), we must be particularly careful that it > complies with all Apache guidelines for an incubator release. As such, before > voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the checklist at > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list. > > If anyone has concerns that we don't meet any of these requirements, please > don't hesitate to raise them here so we can discuss and make changes if > necessary. > > If you do give a +1 vote, please include what steps you took in order to be > confident in the release. > > Please also note from Ross's recent email: > >> What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means three >> IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project >> management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having a >> binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their >> preference and (assuming no blocking issues on an IP check) I'll >> always vote in support of the communities non- binding votes. > > So please, even though your vote may not be binding, take some time to review > the release and vote! > > Upon a successful vote, we will arrange for the archive to be uploaded to > dist/incubator/ and publish it to NPM. > > I vote +1: > > * I verified build works and tests all pass. > * I verified license headers with Apache RAT (via 'jake rat'). > * I manually verified all third party licenses in node_modules. > > Thanks, > > Tim >
