Awesome!

Thanks to Tim, and everyone else who got the project up to par for an
official release! :-D

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, 21:37 Tim Barham <[email protected]> wrote:

> The vote has now closed with the following results:
>
> Positive binding votes: 4
> Ross Gardler
> Christian Grobmeier
> Jan Iversen
> Justin Mclean
>
> Positive non-binding votes: 2
> Tim Barham
> Arzhan Kinzhalin
>
> No negative votes.
>
> The vote has passed. I will publish to dist and npm.
>
> Thanks all for helping get out our first official Apache release of Ripple!
>
> Tim
> ________________________________________
> From: Tim Barham <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 4:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30
>
> Vote results are:
>
> IPMC votes: 2
> Ross Gardler
> Christian Grobmeier
>
> PPMC votes: 1
> Tim Barham
>
> Other votes: 1
> Arzhan Kinzhalin
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple release 0.9.30
>
> Sorry for my delayed vote. I haven't seen a result yet, so I just
> checked the release.
>
> It looks find for me: +1
>
> I have seen minor things which are not blocking: the NOTICE file
> contains 2012 as year. Maybe update to 2012 - 2015 with the next
> release.
> The sha file contains lower case numbers. But:
>
> gpg --print-md SHA512
>
> outputs uppercase letters. Not sure if there is a standard, but maybe we
> should include uppercase letters in the next sha file generation. Please
> note, I am not really into all that stuff, so this will work, but it saw
> it.
>
> Other than that: great job guys. Sorry once again for my delayed
> response. Lets hope others are quicker than I am!
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 20:41, Tim Barham wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay getting this out, everyone. Travel + other
> > distractions + my Mac not being hooked up. Thanks to Arzhan for a bunch
> > of work figuring out OpenLayers licenses. Anyway... here it is...
> >
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.30.
> >
> >
> >
> > The package you are voting on is available for review at
> > http://1drv.ms/1H9yF5h. It was published from its corresponding git tag:
> >
> >       incubator-ripple: 0.9.30 (7830f1ac70)
> >
> >
> >
> > Since this will be an official Apache release of Ripple (another attempt
> > at our first official release!), we must be particularly careful that it
> > complies with all Apache guidelines for an incubator release. As such,
> > before voting +1, please refer to and verify compliance with the
> > checklist at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list.
> >
> >
> >
> > If anyone has concerns that we don't meet any of these requirements,
> > please don't hesitate to raise them here so we can discuss and make
> > changes if necessary.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you do give a +1 vote, please include what steps you took in order to
> > be confident in the release.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please also note from Ross's recent email:
> >
> >
> >
> > > What we need is three +1 "binding" votes, in reality that means three
> >
> > > IPMC members. Once a project graduates it means three project
> >
> > > management committee members. However, as a mentor (therefore having a
> >
> > > binding vote) I look to the project participants to indicate their
> >
> > > preference and (assuming no blocking issues on an IP check) I'll
> >
> > > always vote in support of the communities non- binding votes.
> >
> >
> >
> > So please, even though your vote may not be binding, take some time to
> > review the release and vote!
> >
> >
> >
> > Upon a successful vote, we will arrange for the archive to be uploaded to
> > dist/incubator/ and publish it to NPM.
> >
> >
> >
> > I vote +1:
> >
> > * I verified build works and tests all pass.
> >
> > * I verified license headers with Apache RAT (via 'jake rat').
> >
> > * I manually verified all third party licenses in node_modules.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
>

Reply via email to