Deviceready not firing usually means something has failed during initialization... If it works outside of Ripple it is likely indicative of a Ripple bug. Can you send me your Cordova project (direct to [email protected])?
-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Ripple website update (Was: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32) Thanks Tim. So coming at this fresh, I installed ripple, and *just* the CLI. When emulating a Cordova project, it doesn't fire deviceready for me automatically, and even manually doing it doesn't work right. What am i doing wrong? On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Tim Barham <[email protected]> wrote: > I made some updates to the website today. Specifically: > > * Added "News" section with information about Ripple releases (this isn't an > RSS feed or anything, but at least it's something). I included the release we > just did, plus the previously release (these are the only two official Apache > releases do far). > * Updated "Download" section to describe installation from npm. > * Updated "Documentation" section to remove reference to "two places to > look", when only one place was listed (but also added pointers to > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=README.md&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cb60836a5e00b474f439908d2b1bfff11%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=kudJhX9xhJe3YNPflonDZFU42qsWsMVn%2fqQB3TUCdm8%3d > and > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=HACKING.md&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cb60836a5e00b474f439908d2b1bfff11%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=J%2fG7U5Se32%2fZDCDVebQ2sPahYYtK4fES0xwu%2faHgTNc%3d). > > If anyone has any suggested alternations to these changes, please let me know > (or just make the changes :) ). > > Thanks, > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 > > Just as a reminder - whenever this release goes live, can someone > update the public web site? > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Tim Barham <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, thanks everyone, and sorry for the ping - I missed those as I'm not >> subscribed to [email protected]. >> >> Tim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 12:32 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 >> >> Tim, there were a couple of additional IPMC votes you can close the vote >> with a result thread: >> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmarkm >> ail.org%2fthread%2fh7pwrlvoousj6x2q&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd >> .microsoft.com%7c4f5652b522394c2b52c808d2afb61be3%7c72f988bf86f141af9 >> 1ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=71C3vafd06IaTXLgimYJhwR3c5ATRTtwdApYdOesFcg >> %3d >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tim Barham [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 6:59 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 >> >> Ping! Any takers for a final IPMC vote? This should be a fairly easy one to >> validate, as there were very few changes since the last release (but one of >> those is an important fix we need to get out). >> >> Thanks! >> >> Tim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 8:57 AM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 >> >> Moving comdev to BCC, adding dev@ripple as it should have been >> >> Ross >> >> From: Ross Gardler >> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 2:43 PM >> To: [email protected]; ComDev <[email protected]> >> Subject: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 >> >> A vote is underway on the Ripple Dev list for release 0.9.32. >> >> The Ripple dev thread can be found at >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail- >> archives.apache.org%2fmod_mbox%2fincubator-ripple-dev%2f201508.mbox%2 >> fbrowser&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7ce1d3b63489 >> 9b402cd20608d2abb24e57%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=4 >> 3vQT6hSifbgEkNuLz4V7ZvDjpgz1NwXPvm5dmWGW4I%3d >> >> The text of the initial vote email is copied below for your convenience. >> >> At this point we have 2 IPMC votes and 3 PPMC votes, I request IPMC members >> to look over the VOTE for us: >> >> --- pasted initial VOTE text from >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail- >> archives.apache.org%2fmod_mbox%2fincubator-ripple-dev%2f201508.mbox%2 >> fbrowser&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7ce1d3b63489 >> 9b402cd20608d2abb24e57%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=4 >> 3vQT6hSifbgEkNuLz4V7ZvDjpgz1NwXPvm5dmWGW4I%3d >> --- >> >> [Since 0.9.31 was a bust because of a regression, here is another >> release that includes a fix for that regression (and a couple of >> other minor fixes)] >> >> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.32. >> >> The package you are voting on is available for review at >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fdist >> .apache.org%2frepos%2fdist%2fdev%2fincubator%2fripple%2f.&data=01%7c0 >> 1%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7ce1d3b634899b402cd20608d2abb24e >> 57%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=yzBC3iO7dBinoVeu5LWkb >> r6S8G9a4r9xX9N3jlvBTuM%3d >> The SHA-1 hash for the package is: >> >> 63a997594e4f08df8d48a644962b47bee4efd91e >> >> It was published from its corresponding git tag: >> >> incubator-ripple: 0.9.32 (f8c6a0bc99) >> >> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator >> project like Ripple means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple >> contributors and committers/PPMC members are still encouraged to >> review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to and >> verify compliance with the checklist at >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fincub >> ator.apache.org%2fguides%2freleasemanagement.html%23check-list&data=0 >> 1%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7ce1d3b634899b402cd20608d2a >> bb24e57%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ESF8QLBAKhBz21Hy >> HiyNLfrPBHUp7eA8FJHIcyttfYQ%3d (however, we only need to consider >> changes since the previous release). >> >> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be >> confident the release meets requirements. >> >> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to >> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish it to NPM. >> >> I vote +1: >> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat'). >> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license >> headers, nor new third party dependencies that needed to have license >> information included in the LICENSE file. >> * Verified the build works and all tests pass. >> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Tim >> > > > > -- > ====================================================================== > ===== Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM > > Email : [email protected] > Blog : > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.raymondcamden.c > om&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c1ba452838faf4214a > bb408d2b0129637%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2bSeASgq > GMpW%2fZl3EZRpOFmZwgb2OcnVrvt9szeoAcEw%3d > Twitter: raymondcamden -- =========================================================================== Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM Email : [email protected] Blog : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.raymondcamden.com&data=01%7c01%7cTBARHAM%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cb60836a5e00b474f439908d2b1bfff11%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=Mvs05ZNryi6AYqRk9%2fKE9g06DtcPdTNXPIQu9wE7Olo%3d Twitter: raymondcamden
