Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
What do we consider api and what implementation?
As a test i've tried to compile only net.jini.** , and it was not
possible without errors. It could be due to javadoc comments, but
before i test this by stripping the javadocs, removing the unused
imports, i want a clear definition what should be the API within river.
Gr. Simon
Jini Standards are in net.jini.*
Anything that is intended as public api and backward compatible across
releases should go in org.apache.river.api @Beta api IMHO is ok as that
tells people this is future api and encourages collaboration.
Code in other namespaces may change between releases, later added to
public api or standards, or be removed completely.
Cheers,
Peter.
