On Apr 6, 2013, at 532AM, Dan Creswell wrote: > Right so we're into brutal tradeoffs aren't we? > > It's beginning to smell like none of the available branches are suitable > for doing releases from. So we need a branch that is.
AFAIK we are going to be releasing 2.2.1 from the 2.2 branch. Once everything passes muster (Greg is running tests) we will tag the branch 2.2.1 and release. > > i.e. We shouldn't just pick a branch we have, we should get one sorted and > right now. > > What are our chances of pulling just qa changes out of qa-refactoring? Have > we at least got changesets that don't mix concurrency fixes with anything > other than concurrency related changes to tests? You are talking 2.3.0 here? I though qa-trunk was being used for that? Dennis
