Given the number of users on this mailing list, and the tiny number of votes, it seems that many people are abstaining. Why is this such a touchy issue?
-- Dawid Loubser <da...@travellinck.com> Op Ma, 2014-01-20 om 09:25 -0500 skryf Greg Trasuk: > On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:00 AM, Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote: > > > Greg, > > > > We need to define the terms of reference for our discussion of proposed > > changes. We need to avoid emotive arguments, like “complete red herring”, > > “cascade of further failures” and “sweeping changes”. I believe a much > > greater risk is not fixing issues, I believe I can demonstrate that, given > > the opportunity. I also encourage all who are interested to become > > involved. > > > > Which is why I’m asking you to vote on theory driven development: > > I will abstain from this vote. > > Cheers, > > Greg. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
