On Feb 18, 2014, at 1011AM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:
> > By the way, inevitably this container will be compared to Rio and other > containers, and someone will ask “Why didn’t you just use Rio (or ‘startnow', > or Seven, etc)?” What can I say? I had a different itch to scratch. Rio > includes quality-of-service handling that I didn’t need, and I wanted a > container that had a similar deployment model to Tomcat, so I wrote it inside > the Apache River project. People are also encouraged to look at Rio, and if > the Rio group wants to contribute code to River, we should welcome them. I've offered before, River just has not (in the past) been welcoming. Right now, I dont think that either your project or Rio should be part of River. I'd prefer that we have a Related Projects page that includes pointers to River related projects. That might be easiest. Dennis
