I will prepare a patch.

I don't have any need to access ObjectOutputStream when serializing. Only 
accessing local environment when deserializing.

Thanks,
Michal

On Monday, March 10, 2014 05:57:03 PM Peter wrote:
> Serialized objects are given access to streams, you want to send in a patch?
> 
> Do you think that Distributed object's should also be given access to the
> OutputStream too?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter.
> 
> ----- Original message -----
> 
> > How about introducing a builder API:
> > 
> > public My getInstance(Arg1 arg1, ObjectInputStream ois, Arg2 arg2) {...}
> > 
> > public SerialReflectionFactory substitute() {
> >
> >       return     SerialReflectionFactory.builder()
> >         .factory(My.class)
> >         .method("getInstance", ARG_TYPES)
> >         .param(p1)
> >         .streamParam()
> >         .param(p2)
> >         .build();
> >
> > }
> > 
> > where "streamParam()" would indicate a placeholder for the actual input
> > stream.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Michal
> > 
> > On Monday, March 10, 2014 10:48:29 AM Peter wrote:
> > > I'm open to suggestion.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Peter.
> > > 
> > > ----- Original message -----
> > > 
> > > > Peter,
> > > > 
> > > > Can your SerialReflectionFactory expose an API to interact with the
> > > > stream? It     would be enough to be able to retrieve context
> > > > Collection from     ObjectStreamContext.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > <Attachment>     Michał Kłeczek (XPro).vcf
> 
> <Attachment>   Michał Kłeczek (XPro).vcf

-- 
Michał Kłeczek
XPro Sp. z o. o.
ul. Borowskiego 2
03-475 Warszawa
Polska

Reply via email to