Ok. My point is that this project has a long history of success and that history should be reflected in reports to the board. The current discussion is more focused on the issues around getting uptake on the code base and less on its historical and continuing success. I think that the challenge or river is not succeeding, but succeeding in a new community.
Thanks, Bryan ---- Bryan Thompson Chief Scientist & Founder SYSTAP, LLC 4501 Tower Road Greensboro, NC 27410 br...@systap.com http://blazegraph.com http://blog.bigdata.com http://mapgraph.io Blazegraph™ is our ultra high-performance graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and Tinkerpop/Blueprints APIs. MapGraph™ is our disruptive new technology to use GPUs to accelerate data-parallel graph analytics. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and its contents and attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email and its contents and attachments. On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: > On 5/3/2015 1:15 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >> >> It might be useful to say something about the existing projects that >> use jini / river. Among them is www.blazegraph.com. But there are >> many others. > > > I am not sure this is directly board report material. Perhaps update the web > site to show this, and encourage users to inform us of things to add?
