Just release to encourage people to use it. +1 on release.for me. On Aug 6, 2015 2:55 PM, "Patricia Shanahan" <p...@acm.org> wrote:
> Would it be useful to tag it as a 3.0 beta release initially, or just go > to 3.0 and add point releases as needed? > > I will vote in favor of releasing it either way. > > On 8/6/2015 9:55 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: > >> Or just release it. If problems emerge, people can report them and they >> can get fixed. There is a known reliable release now. Let the community >> vote by migrating their code. >> >> Bryan >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: >> >> As far as I can tell, the main remaining release blocker it getting more >>> people to test in more environments. Perhaps we should put out an appeal >>> on >>> u...@river.apache.org? >>> >>> On 8/6/2015 9:33 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>> >>> Maybe it would be good to say a few words about the release goals for >>>> 3.0? >>>> I.e., 3.0 provides a deep refactoring that address performance, >>>> concurrency >>>> and scaling issues. Significant progress has been made towards the 3.0 >>>> release target. X new tests have been developed for this release. The >>>> remaining blockers for a release are .... >>>> >>>
