I support to have thoughtful discussion regarding River future direction proposed by Patricia.
Bishnu Prasad Gautam > Subject: Re: VOTE: Take Security seriously or my resignation. > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:13:23 -0800 > > Please, please cancel this. > > We do need to have a serious discussion of River future direction. I > expect that discussion to take a lot longer than a week, and hope it > will involve as many users and potential users of River as possible. For > example, we may need to canvas other project mailing lists to find out > whether a River with specific changes would be useful to them. > > It will certainly take me more than a week to study the subject, and the > various opinions about it, sufficiently to be prepared to vote. > > I feel, very strongly, that we need to get River 3.0 out the door ASAP. > Even with enough time for proper study, holding the River future > discussion first will inevitably distract from that objective and delay > the release. I thought that was also the PMC consensus. > > My preferred plan is get existing changes out as River 3.0 first, then > discussion and study, then vote on future direction. I am sorely tempted > to resign if this premature vote goes ahead, regardless of the outcome, > but will not because I don't think such threats are an appropriate way > of influencing PMC votes. > > Patricia > > On 1/6/2016 4:21 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: > > Option 1. I propose that we take security seriously, no security patches > > are to be rejected prior to review, that we review and analyse them > > properly based on merit. That discussions about security issues be taken > > seriously. > > > > Option 2. Alternatively I resign my River committer status > > > > Please cast your vote, the vote is open for 7 days. > > > > Let the community decide. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter > > > > Sent from my Samsung device. > > > >
