Could you make a proposal how to arrange the git repo(s)? Please mitigate for:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/206668/using-multiple-git-repositories-instead-of-a-single-one-containing-many-apps-fro http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/161293/choosing-between-single-or-multiple-projects-in-a-git-repository G. Simon On 09-09-16 13:14, Bryan Thompson wrote: > I have become significantly pro-git over the last few years. I feel that > it is much more nimble, and I think the goal here is to help make river > more modular and gain the ability for an improved pace of development. > > Can you expand on your objection about scripts and complexity incurred? > > Bryan > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> wrote: > >> If any, please dont. >> >> The amount of scripting or addons that is needed to have multiple repos >> integrated does not outweigh the perceived benefits of git. >> >> The amount of work in forking, pushing, merging etc. is a lot compared to >> subversion commits. >> >> You can have your own git, sync it with subversion, and back patch the >> changes into subversion. >> >> So you can still have your own git, and have subversion for the project. >> >> OK, subversion is not as nimble as git. But so fast we are not really >> going are we? >> >> G. Simon
