+1, I checked - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. - Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. - License and Notice are correct in source package. - License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org> > 发送时间: 2020-04-07 09:44:04 (星期二) > 收件人: "dev@rocketmq.apache.org" <dev@rocketmq.apache.org> > 抄送: > 主题: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Client CPP 2.2.0 RC1. > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > This is the vote for version 2.2.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP. > This release support TLS mode with OpenSSL for sending messages in sync model and consuming messages by push model and use an separate producer to send trace messages. > > > The artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.2.0-rc1/ > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.2.0 > Hash for the release tag: > 6579eb637f81bca29f59f1e8645897a8c12a0871 > Release Notes: > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.2.0/ > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys > file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > Checklist for reference, > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. > Fill in the following: > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [ ] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [ ] License and Notice are correct in source package. > [ ] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > [ ] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > [ ] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > [ ] The code can be built success in the source package. > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > Please vote accordingly: > > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > Thanks, > The Apache RocketMQ Team > </dev@rocketmq.apache.org></ding...@apache.org>
